Post by account_disabled on Feb 15, 2024 10:26:38 GMT
Furthermore in Laudato Si Francis argues in favor of situated socioenvironmental agendas because poor countries need to prioritize the eradication of misery and the social development of their inhabitants and recognizes that while it is true that they must develop forms less polluting energy production to do so they require the help of countries that have grown a lot at the expense of the current pollution of the planet. to this argument and emphasizes that the challenge is not only to finance the adaptation of poor countries but that it is necessary to compensate them for the damage already suffered.
The solution cannot be sought he argues in the dissemination Venezuela Email List generic environmental education the same in Stockholm Santiago de Chile Berlin or Guayaquil. It is obvious maintains the pontiff that it is not enough for each person to be better to resolve a situation as complex as the one facing the world today. Worse still isolated individuals can lose their ability and freedom to overcome the logic of instrumental reason and end up at the mercy of consumerism without ethics and without social and environmental sense. Social problems are responded to with community networks not with the mere sum of individual assets.
A sharp geopolitics Pope Francis seems to want to make it clear that one cannot think of uniform recipes because there are problems and limits specific to each country or region. This is without a doubt the most radical definition of Laudato Si in geopolitical terms because it implies introducing the principle of historical justice when talking about the care of the Common Home.