Post by account_disabled on Mar 9, 2024 8:37:54 GMT
Samuel LEE I agree, the only other right is an 'algorithmic right'. Personally, an algorithm is functional and therefore should only be protected by a patent right. There is some discussion about algorithmic rights, which is really about software rights, which are typically covered by copyright and need to be of the entire software. An algorithmic right is one functional part of that software and, therefore, should not be protected separately. We have sufficient protections under copyright and patents. Concerning database rights, it is difficult to understand and define a database unless it has a particular functional value to it, eg, healthcare data related to a certain cancer. This is a very strong database, so unless it is a specialized database where you can define and identify it properly, it is not easy to enforce, if someone breaches this right. Do data mining activities infringe copyright? Samuel LEE: Possibly, but it depends on the underlying facts. Data mining is identifying trends within a ton of data. To understand the trends, you have to read and evaluate that data and compare it with other data.
Depending on how the original data is there might be a copyright infringement. Conclusion Caroline BERUBE and Prof. Laurent MANDERIEUX expressed gratitude to the speakers. Prof. Manuel DESANTES: Thanked Caroline Berube for acting as moderator, the speakers, attendees, and reporters. Noticed that the panel has dealt with dozens of issues. Starting with the question do not have other competitors building on top of what you did (other than based on certain performance criteria, like in the generative AI models in the US). That said, IP is important as UK Phone Number it helps with funding, investments, and competition. Caroline BERUBE: IP is always crucial to increasing the value of a company and its assets. Companiesdo not want to be completely “colonized” as we need a balance. Firms need to innovate, but there needs to be room for future innovation. That is why we are talking about IP from an economic perspective, as it is meant to eventually expire (this can be trickier with trade secrets). Of course, the patents, the investments that need to happen, and the ability for companies to know what they are buying.
All these things are important, and IP is fundamental to all of those. But we shall add the fact that we need to think about how this knowledge will be used 10-20 years from now and it needs to be more open at the same time. Samuel LEE: A lot of this important data is held by large companies, and it is not public. Authorities in many countries have started looking into this area. Google, Amazon, and Apple keep a lot of data and they use that data for their own purposes. Then the question needs to be asked: should that data be accessible to the public? And if so in which form? Taking into account that there are also data privacy issues and certain countries require their citizens' data to stay within their national boundaries (eg, India, China), how much anonymization of that data needs to be done to be able to freely allow sharing of what on IP enhancing innovation, and then bringing into discussion the Asia perspective and considering from an economic perspective. As well as delving into relevant issues and specific fields such as healthcare data, data privacy and legislation protection, copyright, trademarks and virtual marks, trade secrets in the new economy, open innovation, and the challenge of open data, etc. By bringing new questions to the encounters, we enlarge the potential of future encounters and enlarge the potential of our attendance. What is evident is that things are changing very rapidly, and the IP system has to respond with the same speed. Report written by GDE Support Team members Arielle Ab.
Depending on how the original data is there might be a copyright infringement. Conclusion Caroline BERUBE and Prof. Laurent MANDERIEUX expressed gratitude to the speakers. Prof. Manuel DESANTES: Thanked Caroline Berube for acting as moderator, the speakers, attendees, and reporters. Noticed that the panel has dealt with dozens of issues. Starting with the question do not have other competitors building on top of what you did (other than based on certain performance criteria, like in the generative AI models in the US). That said, IP is important as UK Phone Number it helps with funding, investments, and competition. Caroline BERUBE: IP is always crucial to increasing the value of a company and its assets. Companiesdo not want to be completely “colonized” as we need a balance. Firms need to innovate, but there needs to be room for future innovation. That is why we are talking about IP from an economic perspective, as it is meant to eventually expire (this can be trickier with trade secrets). Of course, the patents, the investments that need to happen, and the ability for companies to know what they are buying.
All these things are important, and IP is fundamental to all of those. But we shall add the fact that we need to think about how this knowledge will be used 10-20 years from now and it needs to be more open at the same time. Samuel LEE: A lot of this important data is held by large companies, and it is not public. Authorities in many countries have started looking into this area. Google, Amazon, and Apple keep a lot of data and they use that data for their own purposes. Then the question needs to be asked: should that data be accessible to the public? And if so in which form? Taking into account that there are also data privacy issues and certain countries require their citizens' data to stay within their national boundaries (eg, India, China), how much anonymization of that data needs to be done to be able to freely allow sharing of what on IP enhancing innovation, and then bringing into discussion the Asia perspective and considering from an economic perspective. As well as delving into relevant issues and specific fields such as healthcare data, data privacy and legislation protection, copyright, trademarks and virtual marks, trade secrets in the new economy, open innovation, and the challenge of open data, etc. By bringing new questions to the encounters, we enlarge the potential of future encounters and enlarge the potential of our attendance. What is evident is that things are changing very rapidly, and the IP system has to respond with the same speed. Report written by GDE Support Team members Arielle Ab.